Join Our Newsletter!

Keep up to date with our latest blog posts, new widgets and features, and the Common Ninja Developer Platform.

A Guide to Understanding Seeding in March Madness

Common Ninja,

Summary (TL;DR): This article delves into the phenomenon of March Madness, providing an overview of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. It explains the concept of seeding, detailing its purpose, significance, and the criteria used to seed teams. The piece breaks down the tournament's bracket structure, highlighting the advantages of higher seeding and the allure of historic upsets. While the system has its critics, the article discusses controversies and the evolution of seeding over the years. For fans looking to predict outcomes, the article offers tips on analyzing match-ups and understanding the historical performance of seeds in the tournament.

A Guide to Understanding Seeding in March Madness

Every March, the sporting world turns its attention to one of the most exhilarating and unpredictable tournaments: March Madness. This college basketball extravaganza captures the hearts and minds of fans across the nation, with underdogs, buzzer-beaters, and Cinderella stories unfolding at every turn. 

Central to the drama and strategy of the tournament is the concept of seeding. Seeding, while seemingly a simple numbering system, plays a pivotal role in shaping the tournament's dynamics and outcomes. 

This guide will delve into the intricacies of seeding in March Madness, offering insights into its significance, the selection process, and its impact on the tournament's narrative.

Introduction to March Madness

March Madness, a term that evokes excitement, competition, and the spirit of collegiate sports, is more than just a basketball tournament—it's a cultural phenomenon. Every spring, college basketball fans from all over the United States, and even around the world, tune in to witness the drama, upsets, and triumphs of this iconic event.

Brief Overview of the NCAA Basketball Tournament

The NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, colloquially known as March Madness, is an annual college basketball tournament held in the United States. Organized by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the tournament features 68 college basketball teams from the Division I level of the NCAA, competing in a single-elimination format. 

The tournament begins with a "First Four" round and culminates in the "Final Four" and the championship game. The teams are selected based on their performance during the regular season and through conference tournaments, with a selection committee determining seeding and matchups.

The Significance of March Madness in College Sports

March Madness holds a special place in the heart of college sports. For many schools, especially smaller or lesser-known institutions, earning a spot in the tournament can put them on the national stage. 

The event is known for its "Cinderella stories," where lower-seeded teams upset higher-seeded opponents, capturing the imagination of fans and showcasing the unpredictability of the sport.

Beyond the games themselves, March Madness has a significant cultural and economic impact. Office pools, bracket challenges, and viewing parties have become annual traditions. The tournament also provides a significant boost to the host cities, with fans traveling to support their teams, leading to increased tourism and business for local establishments.

The Concept of Seeding

In the realm of sports and competitive tournaments, the term "seeding" is often thrown around, but what does it truly mean? And why is it so crucial in determining the course of a tournament, especially in events as significant as March Madness?

What is Seeding?

Seeding is a method used in tournaments to rank participants or teams based on their perceived strength or past performance. In essence, seeds serve as placeholders that determine the initial matchups in a competition. 

The highest-ranked participant (often the number one seed) is typically matched against the lowest-ranked participant, the second-highest against the second-lowest, and so on. This system ensures that the strongest competitors do not face each other in the early rounds, allowing for potentially more exciting and competitive matches in the later stages of the tournament.

The Purpose and Importance of Seeding in Tournaments

Seeding plays a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of a tournament for several reasons:

  • Fairness: By ranking teams based on their performance or other criteria, seeding ensures that the most deserving teams have a slightly easier path in the early stages of the competition. This rewards teams for their regular-season performance or other accomplishments leading up to the tournament.
  • Excitement and Anticipation: Seeding can lead to intriguing matchups, especially in the later rounds. As higher-seeded teams progress, the likelihood of top teams clashing increases, creating much-anticipated games that draw significant viewer interest.
  • Avoiding Early Exits for Top Teams: Without seeding, top teams could face each other in the initial rounds, leading to early exits for some of the best competitors. This could deprive fans of seeing these teams play multiple games and diminish the overall quality of the tournament's later stages.
  • Narrative and Storytelling: Seeding often sets the stage for "David vs. Goliath" matchups, where lower-seeded "underdog" teams have the chance to upset higher-seeded "favorites." These stories captivate audiences and add a layer of drama and unpredictability to the competition.

Criteria for Seeding Teams in March Madness

March Madness, the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, is one of the most anticipated sporting events in the United States. Every year, 68 college basketball teams compete for the national championship in a single-elimination format. 

But before the first whistle is blown, a complex process determines the seeding of these teams. This seeding is crucial, as it sets the stage for the matchups and the tournament's overall trajectory. So, what criteria are used to seed teams in March Madness?

Win-Loss Records and Strength of Schedule

One of the primary factors considered when seeding teams is their win-loss record during the regular season. A team with a strong winning record is likely to receive a higher seed. However, not all records are viewed equally. The strength of a team's schedule plays a significant role in this evaluation.

For instance, a team with a 25-5 record that has played against top-ranked opponents might be seeded higher than a team with a 28-2 record that has faced mostly lower-ranked teams. The rationale is that consistently playing (and winning) against strong opponents demonstrates a team's quality and resilience.

Performance in Conference Tournaments

While the regular season is essential, how a team performs in its conference tournament can also influence its seeding. Winning a conference championship can bolster a team's resume and potentially improve its seed. 

Conversely, an early exit from the conference tournament, especially for a highly-ranked team, might raise questions about its readiness for the national tournament.

Rankings and Expert Opinions

Various polls and rankings provide insights into a team's standing in the national landscape. The Associated Press (AP) poll and the USA Today Coaches Poll are two prominent rankings that the Selection Committee might consider. These rankings are based on votes from sportswriters and coaches, respectively, and offer a consensus view of the top teams in the country.

In addition to these polls, the NCAA also uses the NET (NCAA Evaluation Tool) ranking, which considers factors like game results, strength of schedule, game location, and scoring margin. The NET ranking, introduced in 2018, aims to provide a more comprehensive and objective measure of team performance.

Furthermore, expert opinions, including insights from analysts, commentators, and former coaches, can influence the perception of a team's strength and potential in the tournament.

The Bracket Breakdown

March Madness is synonymous with excitement, unpredictability, and the sheer joy of college basketball. At the heart of this frenzy is the tournament bracket, a structure that organizes the matchups and charts the journey of 68 teams as they vie for the national championship. 

Understanding the bracket is key to appreciating the nuances and strategies of the tournament. Let's delve into its intricacies.

The Four Regions of the Tournament

The NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament is divided into four distinct regions, each named after a cardinal direction: East, West, South, and Midwest. These regions are not strictly geographical but are used to distribute teams in a manner that ensures competitive balance and, when possible, minimizes travel for teams and their fans.

Each region has its mini-tournament, starting with 16 teams. The winner of each regional bracket advances to the "Final Four," the tournament's climax, where the champions of each region face off in the national semifinals and, subsequently, the national championship.

Numbered Seeds from 1 to 16

Within each region, teams are seeded based on their performance during the regular season, conference tournaments, and other criteria discussed earlier. The seeding is numbered from 1 to 16, with the No. 1 seed being the strongest team in the region, and the No. 16 seed being the weakest.

The seeding system is designed to reward higher-ranked teams. In the first round, the No. 1 seed plays the No. 16 seed, the No. 2 seed faces the No. 15 seed, and so on. This means that top-seeded teams initially face opponents deemed to be the least formidable in their region.

The Path Each Seed Takes in the Tournament

The journey through the tournament varies based on seeding. Higher seeds, due to their favorable matchups, are statistically more likely to advance to the later rounds. However, March Madness is notorious for its upsets, where lower-seeded teams knock out favorites.

For a No. 1 seed, the path is theoretically the easiest, as they face the lowest-ranked teams in the early rounds. However, the pressure is immense, as they are expected to perform and advance.

For middle seeds, the journey is unpredictable. They face teams of comparable strength, making their progression less certain.

Lower seeds, especially the No. 15 and No. 16 seeds, have the most challenging path. A victory for a No. 16 seed over a No. 1 seed was once considered a near-impossibility until UMBC achieved this feat in 2018.

As teams progress, they move from the first round to the second, then to the Sweet 16, Elite Eight, and finally, for regional champions, the coveted Final Four. Each step on this journey is fraught with challenges, drama, and the dreams of players and fans alike.

The Best Bracket Maker for March Madness Tournaments

March Madness tournaments are a whirlwind of excitement and competition. To truly capture the essence of this sporting spectacle, we've crafted the definitive Bracket Widget. Perfect for fans tracking their favorite teams or organizers orchestrating the event, our tool offers an easy setup, dynamic customization, and seamless website embedding. Its modern interface, coupled with real-time updates and interactive voting features, makes it an indispensable asset for the season. Dive into the heart of the tournament with the unparalleled bracket solution from Common Ninja!

Advantages of Higher Seeding

In the world of sports tournaments, seeding is a method used to rank teams based on their performance, achievements, and other criteria. In the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, commonly referred to as March Madness, seeding plays a pivotal role in shaping the competition's dynamics. 

Teams that secure higher seeds enjoy several advantages that can significantly influence their journey through the tournament. Let's explore these benefits in detail.

Favorable Match-ups in Early Rounds

One of the most evident advantages of a higher seed is the initial match-ups. In the first round, the No. 1 seed faces the No. 16 seed, the No. 2 seed competes against the No. 15 seed, and so on. 

This system ensures that the top-performing teams during the regular season are rewarded with theoretically easier opponents in the tournament's opening stages. While upsets are a hallmark of March Madness, higher seeds generally have a statistical edge in these early encounters, increasing their chances of advancing to subsequent rounds.

Potential Home-Court Advantages

While the NCAA tournament games are played at neutral sites, higher-seeded teams often benefit from locations closer to their campuses or fan bases. This proximity can result in a de facto home-court advantage, as local fans can attend the games more easily. 

The familiar roar of supportive fans, the sea of team colors in the stands, and the reduced travel fatigue can provide a significant boost to the players, enhancing their performance on the court.

Psychological Edge and Momentum

Securing a high seed is not just a logistical advantage; it's also a psychological one. Being recognized as one of the top teams in the tournament instills confidence in players and coaching staff. 

This self-belief can be a driving force, propelling teams to perform at their peak. Moreover, opponents might feel the pressure of facing a top-seeded team, leading to potential errors or hesitations in their gameplay. 

The momentum gained from a successful regular season, coupled with the recognition of a high seed, can be a formidable combination in the high-stakes environment of March Madness.

Historic Upsets and the "Cinderella" Stories

March Madness, the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, is synonymous with unpredictability. Every year, amidst the high-octane games and nail-biting finishes, emerge stories of underdogs—teams that defy the odds, challenge the status quo, and leave an indelible mark on the history of the tournament. 

These "Cinderella" teams, often lower-seeded, become the embodiment of hope, determination, and the sheer unpredictability of sports. Let's delve into the magic of these upsets and the allure of the underdog in March Madness.

Famous Lower-Seeded Teams Defeating Top Seeds

The annals of March Madness are replete with tales of lower-seeded teams pulling off incredible upsets. One of the most iconic moments came in 1985 when the eighth-seeded Villanova Wildcats defeated the top-seeded Georgetown Hoyas to win the national championship. 

Similarly, in 2006, the 11th-seeded George Mason Patriots made a historic run to the Final Four, defeating powerhouses like Michigan State, North Carolina, and Connecticut along the way. More recently, in 2018, the UMBC Retrievers, a 16th seed, stunned the basketball world by defeating the top-seeded Virginia Cavaliers, marking the first time a No. 16 seed had ever beaten a No. 1 seed in the tournament.

The Allure of the Underdog in March Madness

There's something inherently captivating about rooting for the underdog. These teams, often overlooked and underestimated, carry the hopes of the neutral fans and become the tournament's darlings. 

Their victories are seen as triumphs of spirit, teamwork, and determination over mere talent or reputation. Every jump shot, every defensive stop, and every strategic move by these teams is cheered, as fans and viewers collectively will them to extend their fairy-tale run. The unpredictability they bring to the bracket adds to the tournament's charm, making March truly "mad."

Impact of Upsets on Tournament Dynamics

While upsets are celebrated, they also significantly alter the tournament's dynamics. Brackets are busted, and predictions go awry as top-seeded teams make early exits. This reshuffling often opens up opportunities for other teams, creating new potential match-ups and narratives.

Moreover, these upsets can be strategic boons for other higher-seeded teams, who might face a presumably easier opponent in the subsequent rounds. However, as many teams have learned, underestimating a Cinderella team can be perilous.

Criticisms and Controversies of Seeding

The NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, colloquially known as March Madness, is a spectacle that captivates the nation every spring. However, even before the first whistle is blown, debates and controversies often arise, particularly around the seeding process. The task of selecting and seeding 68 teams is no small feat, and the decisions made by the NCAA Selection Committee are frequently met with scrutiny and dissent.

Perceived Biases in Selection and Seeding

One of the primary criticisms levied against the seeding process is the perceived bias towards teams from major conferences or those with significant historical success in the tournament. Critics argue that these teams often receive preferential treatment, resulting in higher seeds, even if their season performance might not necessarily warrant such a position. 

This perceived bias can overshadow the achievements of teams from smaller conferences, who, despite having stellar seasons, might find themselves seeded lower than expected.

The Debate Over "Snubbed" Teams

Every year, as the bracket is revealed, discussions erupt over teams that were "snubbed" or left out of the tournament altogether. These debates intensify when a team with a strong resume, perhaps from a lesser-known conference, is omitted in favor of a team from a major conference with a comparable or even weaker record. 

The subjective nature of the selection process, which considers factors like strength of schedule, quality wins, and even the "eye test," leaves ample room for disagreement and contention.

Calls for Seeding Reforms

Given the annual controversies, there have been consistent calls for reforms in the seeding process. Some suggest expanding the tournament field, allowing more teams a shot at the title. Others propose more transparency in the selection criteria or even the inclusion of independent analysts and former players in the decision-making process. 

The aim of these proposed reforms is to make the seeding process more equitable, transparent, and reflective of the teams' true capabilities.

The Evolution of Seeding in March Madness

March Madness, the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, has undergone significant changes since its inception in 1939. The seeding process, in particular, has evolved in response to the changing landscape of college basketball and the growth of the tournament itself. This evolution has been marked by shifts in selection criteria, expansions of the tournament field, and adaptations to the modern dynamics of the sport.

Historical Changes in Selection Criteria

In the early days of the tournament, the selection process was relatively straightforward, with teams chosen based on their performance in the regular season and conference tournaments. 

However, as college basketball grew in popularity and complexity, the need for a more nuanced selection process became evident. The NCAA introduced the RPI (Ratings Percentage Index) in the 1980s, which considered factors like strength of schedule, quality wins, and losses. Over time, the RPI has been supplemented and eventually replaced by the NET (NCAA Evaluation Tool), which incorporates game results, strength of schedule, game location, and other advanced metrics.

Expansion of the Tournament Field

The tournament has grown exponentially from its modest beginnings, which featured only eight teams. Over the decades, the field expanded multiple times, reaching its current format of 68 teams in 2011. Each expansion brought about changes in the seeding process, with the introduction of play-in games, also known as the "First Four," being one of the most significant recent developments.

Adaptations to Modern College Basketball Dynamics

The modern era of college basketball is characterized by increased player mobility, with transfers and one-and-done players becoming more common. This dynamism has necessitated changes in how teams are evaluated and seeded. 

The Selection Committee now places a greater emphasis on a team's performance in the latter part of the season, considering factors like player injuries, team chemistry, and momentum heading into the tournament.

Tips for Fans: Predicting Outcomes Based on Seeding

March Madness is not just a showcase of the best in college basketball; it's also a time when fans everywhere try their hand at predicting the outcomes of games. The seeding system provides a framework for these predictions, but as any seasoned fan knows, upsets are a hallmark of the tournament. Here are some tips to help fans make informed decisions when filling out their brackets.

Analyzing Match-ups and Potential Upsets

  • Look Beyond the Seed Number: While seeding provides a general idea of a team's performance over the season, it's essential to delve deeper. Examine how teams have performed against common opponents or how they fare against specific playing styles.
  • Consider Recent Performance: A team that enters the tournament on a hot streak, even if lower-seeded, can be a potential giant killer. Conversely, higher-seeded teams that have stumbled in their conference tournaments might be vulnerable.
  • Player Match-ups: Individual player match-ups can be crucial. A lower-seeded team with a star player or a specific strength (like rebounding or three-point shooting) can exploit vulnerabilities in higher-seeded teams.

Understanding the Historical Performance of Seeds

  • Top Seeds: Historically, No. 1 seeds have a strong track record, especially in the early rounds. However, only once have all four No. 1 seeds made it to the Final Four (2008).
  • Middle Seeds: Seeds ranging from 5 to 12 are where most of the bracket-busting happens. Particularly, the 12 vs. 5 match-up has been notorious for upsets.
  • Low Seeds: While No. 16 seeds historically struggled against No. 1 seeds, UMBC's win over Virginia in 2018 proved that anything is possible. Still, such upsets are rare.

Balancing Stats with Intuition in Bracket Predictions

  • Trust the Data, But Not Blindly: Advanced metrics, analytics, and historical trends can provide valuable insights. However, basketball is unpredictable, and intangibles like team chemistry, coaching, and sheer will can tilt the outcome.
  • Gut Feelings Matter: Sometimes, it's okay to pick a team because you have a hunch or because they're your alma mater. Brackets are as much about fun as they are about accuracy.
  • Avoid Homogeneity: If you're in a pool with many participants, picking a few unconventional outcomes can set your bracket apart. This strategy can be risky, but it can also yield big rewards.


In conclusion, seeding in March Madness is more than just a ranking system; it's a reflection of a team's journey, performance, and potential in the face of fierce competition. It sets the stage for epic matchups, strategic plays, and the unforgettable moments that define the tournament. 

Remember, while the games themselves are a test of skill, strategy, and spirit, the seeding system ensures a structured yet unpredictable path to the championship. With the insights shared in this article, you're now well-equipped to navigate the nuances of March Madness seeding, appreciating the depth and strategy it brings to one of the most anticipated sports events of the year. So, as the brackets unfold and the games begin, let's celebrate the brilliance of March Madness and the intricate dance of seeding that makes it all possible.